Among the arguments made by those who claim that Paul contradicted Jesus, is the argument that Paul contradicted Jesus with regards to the Law.
Is this so? To begin, let’s consider the following:
Throughout scripture, the Law is referred to as the Law of Moses some 23 times by the following witnesses:
- Joshua (Joshua 8:31, 32 and 23:6)
- Daniel (Daniel 9:11, 13)
- Luke (Luke2:22 and 24:44)
- Paul(Acts 13:39 and 28:23; 1 Corinthians 9:9)
- The Pharisees (Acts 15:5)
- John(John 7:23)
- The author of the book of Hebrews(Hebrews 10:28)
- The author of the book of 1 Kings (1Kings 2:3)
- The author of the book of 2 Kings(2 Kings 14:6 23:25)
- The author of the book of 2 Chronicles (2 Chronicles 23:18 and 30:16)
- The author of the book of Ezra(Ezra 3:2 and 7:6)
- The author of the book of Nehemiah (Nehemiah 8:1)
- Jesus and God, I saved the best for last (John 7:23, Malachi 4:4).
Moses was the one through whom God gave the law to the children of Israel to govern them as a nation. Time and time again the scripture says, “Moses commanded” or “Moses said” or “Moses gave.”
For example, in Matthew 19 the Pharisees asked Jesus, “Why did Moses command to give a writing of divorcement?” Jesus answered, “Moses because of the hardness of your hearts allowed you to put away your wives: but in the beginning it was not so” (v. 7-8).
The Pharisees specifically asked, “Why did MOSES give a writing of divorcement?” Yet the Law was given by God, through Moses, for the people (Deuteronomy 24:1-3). Moses’ instructions were authoritative for the people of Israel, for through Moses, God gave the Law to the children of Israel.
According to Jesus, the bill of divorcement was a law catered for the hard hearted and not God’s intent for marriage. God’s will is for a man to leave his father and mother and cleave to his wife just as Jesus says above. In like manner, Paul says something very similar in Ephesians 5.
Wives, submit yourselves unto your own husbands, as unto the Lord.
For the husband is the head of the wife, even as Christ is the head of the church: and he is the savior of the body.
Therefore as the church is subject unto Christ, so let the wives be to their own husbands in everything.
Husbands, love your wives, even as Christ also loved the church, and gave himself for it;
That he might sanctify and cleanse it with the washing of water by the word,
That he might present it to himself a glorious church, not having spot, or wrinkle, or any such thing; but that it should be holy and without blemish.
So ought men to love their wives as their own bodies. He that loveth his wife loveth himself. (Ephesians 5:22-28)
As we can see from Paul’s words above, Paul was on the same page with Jesus in his view of marriage as a holy institution ordained by God.
Paul’s standard concerning husbands loving their wives actually exceeds the commandment given in Deuteronomy 24:1-3, which was given to regulate the hardhearted. Without question, Paul’s teaching regarding marriage is absolutely is in harmony with the teachings of Jesus.
Those who argue that Paul contradicted Jesus regarding the law think that Jesus taught that the Law would continue while Paul claimed it had been done away with. Yet, this seemingly contradiction is cleared up when the words of Jesus and the teachings of Paul are understood within their context.
First, let’s consider the words of Jesus in Matthew 5:17-18.
Think not that I am come to destroy the law, or the prophets: I am not come to destroy, but to fulfil.
For verily I say unto you, Till heaven and earth pass, one jot or one tittle shall in no wise pass from the law, till all be fulfilled.
When Jesus said these words, he was not intending to imply that he had come as an enforcer of the Law, but rather to the Law it to its fruition through fulfillment.
Jesus was not an opponent to the Law or the message of the prophets. His mission was not to destroy (by discrediting) either one. Instead, his mission was to fulfill both by leading the people of God into the way of righteousness which is faith from a pure heart.
In Matthew 5 Jesus says – “you have heard it said…but I say to you” – referring to what the people had heard from the teachers of the Law.
The Law says, “Thou shalt not kill; and whosoever shall kill shall be in danger of the judgment.” But Jesus says, “whosoever is angry with his brother without a cause shall be in danger of the judgment: and whosoever shall say to his brother, Raca (worthless), shall be in danger of the council: but whosoever shall say, Thou fool, shall be in danger of hell fire.”
The letter of the Law says “thou shall not kill” but Jesus says keep your heart right towards all men. The law says “thou shall not commit adultery” but Jesus says don’t desire her in your heart. The law says “love your neighbor and hate your enemies” but Jesus says love your enemies.
The letter of the Law could not, and cannot give man a right heart and this is what is at the core of the issue. The letter of the Law merely deals with the outward actions of sinful men and does nothing to change the heart.
Jesus Christ addressed the thoughts and intents of the heart and this amplified the law’s real purpose which was to uncover man’s sin resulting in his awareness of his need for mercy.
When the Pharisees brought the woman caught in adultery to Jesus, they had every right according to the letter of the law to condemn her and to stone her. They had no desire to show mercy or to restore her.
Jesus by the wisdom of God dispersed those who condemned her and set her free to sin no more. Those who condemned her wanted to enforce the law upon her, even though they were guilty of sin as well.
They were self righteous and used the Law as a weapon against others rather than teaching the Law to lead men into truth. If they had done the latter they would have recognized that Jesus is the Messiah and the Law would have then led them to faith in him.
Their fixation with the letter of the Law from their uncircumcised hearts, would not allow them to show mercy or compassion to those who were bound by sin and under the power of darkness. They missed the weightier matters of the law which according to Jesus is mercy, faith, and justice (Matthew 23:23). Rather than liberating the people they used the Law to put heavy burdens on them (Matthew 23:4).
Jesus never employed the law to ensnare people. Instead, Jesus taught that the law was fulfilled by love (Matthew 7:12; 22:34-40) and demonstrated it by showing mercy and compassion on the people. Paul also taught that it is love which fulfills the law:
Owe no man any thing, but to love one another: for he that loveth another hath fulfilled the law.
For this, Thou shalt not commit adultery, Thou shalt not kill, Thou shalt not steal, Thou shalt not bear false witness, Thou shalt not covet; and if there be any other commandment, it is briefly comprehended in this saying, namely, Thou shalt love thy neighbour as thyself.
Love worketh no ill to his neighbour: therefore love is the fulfilling of the law. (Romans 13:8-10)
For all the law is fulfilled in one word, even in this; Thou shalt love thy neighbour as thyself. (Galatians 5:14)
Paul actually refers to the fulfillment of the law through love as the “law of Christ.”
Brethren, if a man be overtaken in a fault, ye which are spiritual, restore such an one in the SPIRIT OF MEEKNESS; considering thyself, lest thou also be tempted. Bear ye one another’s burdens, and so FULFILL THE LAW OF CHRIST. (Galatians 6:1-2)
Paul’s doctrine regarding love fulfilling the Law is in perfect harmony with Jesus.
Jesus also taught that all the prophets and the Law prophesied UNTIL God sent John the Baptist (Matthew 11:13). The ministry of John the Baptist was the great point of change from the administration of the Law of Moses through the nation of Israel, to the administration of Christ in the hearts of all who believe in him.
Through Christ, the Law of God is written in the mind and the heart of the child of God. Our conscience has been cleansed by the Blood of Jesus and we have been made alive together with Christ. His life abides in us and the righteousness of the Law is fulfilled in us through his love which is poured out in our hearts by the Holy Spirit.
In those texts where Paul speaks of the Law being abolished, he is not referring to the necessity of obedience to God or righteous living. He is referring to the Law in the manner in which is made a distinction between the Jew and the Gentile in view of the old covenant administration.
The law given to Israel served as their constitution and rule to govern them as a theocracy. The Kingdom of God was manifested through Israel and one could not be a part of God’s Kingdom without becoming a member of the nation of Israel.
Israel was a theocracy, and the Law separated Israel from all other nations as the people of God. Yet, Israel was often very rebellious against God and did not serve him according to the Law God had given to govern them. Consequently Israel inherited the curse.
This is what Paul is dealing with when he addresses the Law as being annulled. The Kingdom of God is no longer a theocracy demonstrated through a physical nation. God’s Kingdom is in the heart of those who follow Jesus, and God’s people are in every nation.
Being circumcised and taking on Jewish identity through the letter of the law no longer has value with regards to covenant relationship with God. What matters is having a circumcised heart through Jesus Christ who died for his people.
In no way did Paul contradict Jesus regarding the law.
For more teachings regarding Paul please follow the links below:
DID PAUL FAIL TO PREACH REPENTANCE?
DID PAUL TEACH OTHERS TO EAT FOOD OFFERED TO IDOLS?
WERE JAMES AND PAUL ON THE SAME PAGE?
PAUL AND THE JEWS RELIGION
WAS PAUL A RICH PREACHER?
PAUL AND HEAVENLY VISIONS